|a1-jonrobins-email.htm||30 March an email sent to Jon Robins and five other related mailboxes. (no replies)|
research projects are led by the journalist Jon Robins and supported
by Gus Sellitto and Richard Elsen.
Jon Robins, director
Gus Sellitto, director
Jon Robins asked Rick Kordowski "Why doesn't he vet claims?" (vet as in research I assume).
Back to 'vet' and 'research' because this is like the 'Kettle calling the Teapot Black'. Jon has attributed all Rick Kordowski's misdemeanours, shortcomings or even his good deeds, depending on how you look at it, to the website Solicitors from Hell .com, repeat .com which means Jon's own 'vetting' talents are grossly lacking. Solicitors from Hell .com, repeat .com is not guilty of any of which Jon claims the website to be.
Let me tell you how SfH.com came into being. From 1993 up to approximately 2000 my solicitors were Thos Boyd Whyte of Bexleyheath in Kent about whom I made a complaint to the Solicitors Complaints Procedure, as I was advised to do by them, and all I found was a Protection Procedure for solicitors.
In 2001 and in my mid sixties I bought a PC and some books to teach myself some rudimentary computer skills so as, in 2002, to tell the world just how corrupt the Law Society's Complaints Procedure was and no doubt still is. Through the backdoor 'Dicky the Chair' Richard Hegarty, Chair of the Compliance Board, threatened three of my consecutive Hosting companies so as to close me down as did Thos Boyd Whyte, TBW also tried to get Google to have me removed from their search engines, 'Queen Bee', Zahida Manzoor the LSO instructed Mace & Jones - see http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com/m&j-solicitors.htm - but saw the light and didn't follow it through.
I believe my website SfH.com again repeat .com was the first to lambast a firm of solicitors and the Law Society Complaints Procedure and was the original Solicitors from Hell website which others copied in various forms.
Instead of sitting on the side of the 'Goodies' may be you should just consider some of us 'Baddies' might have a case even those that Rick Kordowski lists on his website(s).
am now approaching my mid seventies and am still annoyed today as
I was over ten years ago, if you look around you will find a gentleman
older than myself who went one better than I did
Back to your "in-house team of specialist researchers and communications experts" if just one of these 'specialist...experts' or yourself had looked at SfH.com they would have found a 'Disclaimer' of any involvement with Rick Kordowski's website(s). Of course we have 'Freedom of Speech' which the people posting on Rick Kordowski's website(s) are entitled to, the only difference, as I see it, is that you have put your name to defamatory content.
I will expect an apology for stating my domain name, through inadequate 'vetting', in mistake for some other persons and the problem corrected.
There has been a lot said in the past about Rick Kordowski's web stats but if you look at the attachment you will find SfH.com has far greater stats than his with over 1.30mil pageviews per year and Rick's at 751,000, if you check out your own you come in at zero on all accounts.